data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00c7c/00c7c09b2f3189835f782e656af78958395a86bd" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6ef1e/6ef1e0e4c20b9385c0a252b7b7c597be0e746624" alt=""
My vote for the worst, the most obvious and boring film of the year so far -- and we're awfully close to the end of it -- (besides von Trier's Anti Christ, which I must, as I'm sure Lars would want, relegate to a class all its own) -- would be the twenty-ton tiddly-wink from Lukas Moodysson, shown below, entitled MAMMOTH. (When you find out the reason for this title, the movie will sink yet another notch into the mud.) The writer/director's first film in English (and Tagalog!), it wastes the not inconsider-
able talents of performers like Michelle Williams and Gael García Bernal while putting forth several knock-your-socks-off messages such as Parents Should Be With Their Children, Poverty is Wrong, Conspicuous Con-
sumption Is Naughty and other truisms demonstrated with a shocking lack of film-making skill.
Moodysson began garnering international renown with two fine films that were funny, moving and real: Fucking Amal (called Show Me Love on this side of the Atlantic) and Together. He then moved into the realm of dark and vicious "reality" with two terrible movies -- Lilya 4-Ever and A Hole in My Heart -- weirdly, utterly negative in the kind of programmed manner that leaves no room for alter-
natives: Pollyanna in reverse. While it is nice to have the writer/
director working again in the realm of mixed positives and nega-
tives, Mammoth is bad enough to make you wonder if you'd over-rated his early efforts.
![]() |
![]() |
ally embarrassing. I dare say that English is not Moodysson's first language, so was this dialog improvised perhaps? While Ms Willi-
ams (above), always honest and never pushy as an actress, is fine in repose -- her face mirroring so much -- she seems at sea in the several scenes around an operating table (she plays a surgeon).
![]() director's penchant for consistently telling and showing. His single stylistic touch -- the deliberate separation of dialog from visuals -- is of little help. By the close of the seemingly endless 126-minute running time, you can be forgiven for asking, as did I, "This really is all there is?" |
![]() |
No comments:
Post a Comment