Showing posts with label Stan Herd. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Stan Herd. Show all posts

Friday, May 20, 2011

One of the year's best, EARTHWORK opens in L.A.; Q&A with the filmmaker, Chris Ordal

Last month TrustMovies raved about a very small film -- EARTHWORK -- that blurs that line, yet again, between narrative and documentary. It's narrative, all right, but has many earmarks of a documentary. (The original review is here.) Because the movie opens today in Los Angeles (at the Laemmle Music Hall 3 in Beverly Hills, I'm giving it another push, while adding in an interview I did with its writer/director Chris Ordal toward the end of last month, when he was here in New York doing Q&A's with his audiences, post-screening. It stars one of last year's Academy nominees (the excellent John Hawkes), has won numerous awards at festivals across the country (while proving equally popular with audiences), and probes the psychology of the artist about as well as any American film I've seen. I cannot recommend it highly enough.

*********

The young man who made this film seems as friendly and open as we New Yorkers might imagine a Midwesterner to be. Below is an edited transcript of our interview, with TrustMovies in boldface and Ordal (shown below) in standard type.

What I loved most about your film was how it shows us the intense need of the artist to create. I believe most artists can’t help themselves: They just must create their art.

That’s exactly it!

Your movie hits it directly.

I am so glad to hear you connect with that part of the film because people are always asking, about me, "Why don’t you just take this job or that one. And I have to tell them: "You just don’t understand: I can’t do that!"

So your movie also applies to you? Not just to Stan Herd.

When I wrote this film, I very much connected with Stan. He wanted to show people things they don’t usually see. The Thomas Hart Benton connection is what really did it with me. There was more of Benton in the movie but when we spoke with the estate, they really made our life hell, so we couldn’t do it. But Stan was inspired by Benton. And Benton, when he focused on Midwestern themes and Midwestern characters, was completely ostracized by New York and Paris—the established art world. For Stan to come to NYC and do a piece in Benton’s style of a midwestern image, I thought that was so great!

We don’t really get to see much of the finished piece, do we?

You see only a still image of it. But since the movie is kind of about "reveals,” you are introduced to the characters but don't know who they are until after. Same thing with the piece, and all that happens. We don’t realize what the real connection is until after. And I love that.

That’s why, stylistically, I found your movie so wonderful.

Just like Stan’s art, since you can only see it from about, it was to be revealed after the fact.

For me, only showing the tiniest bits -- the briefest things -- seemed perfection, because we get the point – but with no belaboring.

The whole movie is like this. If you look at the way the shots are set up and structred. Really, I think if we’d had more money in the budget I might have screwed it up. (I laugh) No, really!

How much did the film cost?

The movie cost -- right up through going into theaters and getting 35 prints -- a little over a million and a half.

That’s not that much.

Yes. Some people spend more than this just on their opening weekend. When we wrote the original script, the budget was projected at 2 million, but I just couldn’t raise it. The hardest part of the production was just keeping the damned artwork alive.

That would be the plants used for the project?

Yes, and for the opening titles.

Stan is amazing, isn't he? I can't understand how he knows what things will look like so far before the fact. And from that whole other angle – above!

It’s just an instinctual thing; he's got this singular, amazing vision.

And you capture that so well. Beginning with him as a kid. And it’s so wonderful that, even though his folks don’t understand his art, they are supportive anyway. It’s so great that his dad is not against what he wants to do. Which I am assuming is true.

Stan had a wonderful upbringing. And it's funny – I keep getting pounded in the press because critics want more “friction.” But that’s not the way it was.

I’ve always felt that life always gives us more friction -- of all kinds -- than we can easily handle, so we don't need to invent more of it. Be grateful when it isn’t there. And anyway, your movie has plenty of this friciton as it moves along!

If I’d have put friction in, this would have been another movie. And it's one that we've seen already. Many times.

But with your film, I really did feel like I was seeing something fresh. Within a framework of what I have seen many times before -- now, finally, I was seeing something different.

That’s a beautiful statement you just said.

Were there photos taken of Stan's work at that time?

There were photos and all, but they did not get the exposure they deserved. The NY Times had a tiny piece, but it was so small.

I'm wondering: Did you shoot some of your scenes supposedly set here in New York City with actors back in the Midwest, where you lived? Their accents didn't sound like NYC.

Oh, yeah. We had to. We couldn’t afford to film everything here. We had to do it there. But it was important to me that the homeless be from mulitple places. Lone Wolf is from New York, as is “The Mayor.” Ryan, we're not sure where he's from. And El Trac is from Chicago. Outside of El Trac, these were all New York  actors.

They are all so good. Jim McDaniel, particularly. 

He just called me this morning; his son is just getting back from Germany. Jim’s a great guy and just wonderful to work with.

Those are the first words his character speaks in the film, right? And you handle that so well: Not calling any particular attention to it. But we get it. This, I think, is the mark of someone who knows what he is doing.  And yet The New York Times reviewer called these all characters clichéd. How crazy is that? That made me really angry.

It’s funny. I've talked to so many people from NY and L.A. and in the Midwest. People from all over the country, and they all predicted what was going to happen.  "Well, the Times is going to be mean." It's amazing how right they’ve been about that publications. The reviewer just did not connect with the film, and that’s her right. One of my main goals in this film, was to show New York –  the New York that never gets shown. So many New Yorkers who have seen the film, they didn’t know anything like this exisited back then. But it did.

I thought you handled the Donald Trump organization very well. And carefully, maybe.

We were careful, but there were people within Trump's organization -- like the Andy Weiss character -- who really were wonderful to Stan.

They did get him a helicopter, right?

Yes, and the whole story of Stan's getting the procjet because he offered to pay for it all.

If they didn’t have to pay for anything, of course they would give it to Stan.

At first, I couldn't believe that this whole project actually existed. I so much wanted to tell this story, that one day I was just badgering Stan with questions, and finally his eyes just glazed over, and he started talking about his relationship with the homeless, and that even though he viewed this as a kind of failure as an artist career-wise, it was also the kind of moment where he realized that he had connected with one human being and changed that person's life with his art. Stan looked at me right after he said that, and oh, it was really kind of cathartic. "That’s the story!" I thought to myself, and  I ran home that day and wrote an 18-page treatment.

Funny how things happen like that.  How old are you now, Chris?

I'm 29, but I wrote this when I was 24.

Five years of your life spent on this?!

It took me three years just to raise the money.

And you had a job at the time?

I was a student, and I started a video production company with my two producing partners. We just made money doing commercial shoots and spots, and things like that, when I was at KU (The University of Kansas). I was trying to get to the point where I could make an original script. But when Stan’s story showed up, I thought, "This is what I want to say!"

And you didn't want to do it as a documentary?

I struggle with those documentaries where you are just listening to someone tell you what happened. The story I wanted to tell was not a story that connected with artists we all know: Ray Charles, Johnny Cash. I think 99 percent of creative people are not household names. They are not getting any real recognition. They don't have the money or the fame or a name. Stan has been one of those people for years. But he has worked all the while and done his art for years now. So to me, it's a crime not to tell his story.

Was Stan happy with John Hawkes' interpretation?

Oh, yes!

Why did he wear a white hat? Did Stan really do that?

There are times when Stan would wear a hat, but that’s really John’s thing. He wanted some signature visual for the character, so he chose the hat...

Editors' note: There’s a lot more here, but much of it acts as a spoiler for this film, and I want you, reader, to have the experience of seeing this movie fresh. So catch Earthwork if you can, while it's playing in L.A.  Or check out its further playdates here: in Santa Fe, NM;  Paonia, CO; Columbia, MO, Rhinebeck, NY; Peoria, IL; and Fort Wayne, IN.  If you can't catch it at any of these venues, wait for the DVD.

Saturday, April 23, 2011

Film of the year, so far: In EARTHWORK, Chris Ordal gives us crop artist Stan Herd

Hard to believe a film as fine as EARTHWORK has been sitting around for several years (it was made in 2008) before finally getting a theatrical release. Not that it has been exactly idle. This narrative-that-resembles-a-documentary has already appeared at nearly 50 U.S. film festivals around the country (practically one per state), winning numerous awards in the process. It stars John Hawkes, the wiry little actor who was Academy-nominated last year for his work in Winter's Bone, and features a few well known names in supporting roles (James McDaniel, Zach Grenier (shown in the penultimate photo below, with Hawkes) and Bruce MacVittie, among them).

Expertly written and directed by newcomer Chris Ordal (at right), the movie tells the true story of Kansas "crop artist" Stan Herd and the particular project he developed here, of all places, in New York City back in 1994. Alternating scenes that are often dialog-free with others that are dialog heavy, the filmmaker explores the artistic impulse in a manner that few films are able to achieve (Seraphine would be one of these): honestly, realistically and with, I believe, perhaps the best understanding of the artistic personality that I've yet seen. Viewing  Earthwork, you feel strongly the immense need of the artist to create -- but also see the sacrifices that must be made to satisfy that need.

Ordal's film is slow but consistently involving, quiet yet full of incident and connection. As the project takes shape in Manhattan, Herd finds help from some of the homeless who reside in the tunnel near the land on which he's working. (That's McDaniel, above, as one of the most difficult-to-reach of the men.) These people and their own needs remain somewhat mysterious. Bits and pieces of their life float to the surface, however, and slowly we learn.

The filmmaker seems to intuitively understand how much to show and tell and what to leave unspoken and unshown. Things happen -- the first words uttered by one of the men -- simply in passing and without comment. Ordal draws expert performances from his whole cast, too, starting with Hawkes in the lead role. (The actor, shown above, at times looks so scrawny, you fear for his well-being.)

Chris Bachand, above, plays the photographer/graffiti artist in the homeless group, and he, like Herd, is possessed by his art. One of the things the movie makes us understand quite well is that it matters not whether the art is "good" by the viewer's standards. To the artist, it is all.

As the project draws toward it's opening (and near-simultaneous closing: Donald Trump owns the land on which is has been created, and he plans to bulldoze it soon), the need for media coverage and attention becomes paramount, if Herd and his art are to be taken seriously. This artist -- who has mortgaged the family home to raise money for his project -- must now pay back a large bank loan.

How all this plays out is unlike most any other narrative or documentary you will have seen. The experience offers everything: suspense, surprise, desolation and hope. And enormous food for thought. The fact that this is based on a true story seems more germane here than in most movies that make that boast. (I should also say a word for the fine, crisp 35mm photography by Bruce Francis Cole.)

The year is young but as of now this is the film to beat. A model of independent movie-making in every way, Earthwork defines memorable.  It will open this coming Friday, April 29, in New York City at the Angelika Film Center and in Los Angeles on May 20 at Laemmle's Music Hall. For other playdates around the country, click here.