Saturday, January 19, 2019

A Netflix no-no from Spain: Gonzalo Bendala's nitwit thriller, WHEN ANGELS SLEEP


That world-famous (and now seeming to exist just about everywhere in the world) streaming site Netflix has gifted us with lots of worthwhile movies to view, including more and more of which the company has itself distributed. Every so often, though, a real clunker appears in the mix, one that's dumb enough to make a warning worthwhile. Such a film is the new WHEN ANGELS SLEEP, written and directed by Gonzalo Bendala.

The original Spanish poster for the movie, shown below, asks the question: Cuando los angeles duermen, quien nos protege? which translates, TrustMovies believes, to When angels sleep, who protects us?  Here's a better and more useful question the movie-maker might have asked: When every decision made by every character in your film is completely stupid, how can your audience be expected to give a shit?

By the end of this 91-minute would-be dramatic thriller, I found myself talking back aloud to the screen so often, usually saying "For god's sake, don't do that!" that I had pretty much gone hoarse. This is particularly too bad because the film's cast deserves much better.

Lead actor Julián Villagrán (shown below, of Extraterrestrial) plays one of the heads of a Spanish insurance company who is trying to get home in time for his young daughter's birthday party. He is several hours' drive away, however, and so he makes just about every dumb decision possible in order -- or so it begins to appear -- not to get there.

Then we're introduced to a teenage girl who apparently has parent problems. She hates 'em, but from what we're allowed to see, they're merely typically clueless-about-teens, while she seems angry/ugly enough for hospitalization. As played by Ester Expósito (shown at top and below, of the recent and much better Netflix series, Elite), the young lady quickly tries your patience to the point where you're dismayed to realize that you'd be more than happy to see her dead.

And then we have our anti-hero's wife (Marian Álvarez, below), who -- in accepting her hubby's nonsensical excuses while also accepting the advances of next-door neighbor who's helping with that birthday party in lieu of dad --  seems to alternate between dumb and dumber. And if you imagine that the supporting characters are any better, give it up. They're not only just as dumb -- but a whole lot nastier.

Except the police. They're stupider than everyone else put together. Please: Tell me that Spain's cops, including the one in charge of the others here, are smarter than this?! Somebody? Anybody? Guess not. The really weird thing about this movie is that its ending is simply terrific. Or would be, if what preceded it had a trace of actual truth and did not seem instead to have been manipulated within an inch of its life.

This denouement could hardly be darker -- or more directly contradicting one's hopeful idea of any justice existing in our world. There's zero to be found here, which is a difficult, but sometimes salutary thing to accept. Unfortunately, instead of giving us reason/evidence to have to deal with this thesis, we get an uber crappy movie to precede this wonderfully dank and existential ending, one that is worthy, yes, of Beckett and/or Céline.

Streaming now via Netflix, When Angels Sleep, won't put you to sleep. But it will probably make you plenty angry -- and for more bad reasons than good ones.

Thursday, January 17, 2019

In EGG, Marianna Palka/Risa Mickenberg delve into motherhood, womanhood, career and men


Marianna Palka is at it again. After gracing us with the fine, thoughtful and very sexual rom-com, Good Dick, back in 2008, she went on to give us the little-seen but one of 2017's best films, Bitch. Palka wrote and directed those two groundbreakers. With her latest, EGG, she has directed a screenplay by Risa Mickenberg (her first) that seems a very good fit for Ms Palka's interests and skills.

Bitch is streaming now via Netflix. If you haven't seen it, do. It's a difficult movie that goes places I don't think any other film quite has. It turns itself -- and will likely turn you -- inside out, moving from the most intense and difficult anger into, well, you'll see. Ms Palka consistently challenges us, and her gauntlet is worth running.

In her new film, she and Ms Mickenberg explore what "motherhood" means to three very different women (and of course to us, her audience) along with some ideas about feminism, career, male entitlement and, yes, much of the rest of the usual baggage. Yet in the hands of the these two filmmakers (Ms Palka is shown at left), nothing is quite as simple nor as obvious as it may first appear.

There are three women involved in the "motherhood" here, two of which are played by Alysia Reiner, below, left, and Christina Hendricks, right, who were "best friends" in art school a decade or more ago but have not kept up with each other much since.

Reiner, a relatively successful conceptual artist, is having a go at motherhood via a surrogate, while Hendricks, who gave up art but married "well," is very much pregnant and seemingly quite proud of it. Initially these two, along with their husbands, seem like the kind of hypocritical cliche-spouters who you're going to love to hate. But wait. As usual with Palka, things proves not quite so easy.

The movie is divided into sections: first Reiner's, then Reiner's and Hendricks', and finally one devoted to these two plus the beautiful blond surrogate, delightfully played by Anna Camp, above. Everyone's views -- both their pretense and their actual wants and needs -- are aired and given their due, and you will eventually find yourself having to deal with these characters as complex and very problematic people deserving of more than any easy dismissal.

The women, at least. The two men -- nicely played to reveal depths of needy narcissism and male entitlement, by Gbenga Akinnagbe (as Reiner's hubby, shown above, left) and David Alan Basche, as Hendricks', shown above, second from right) -- are mostly poster boys for, yes, narcissism and male entitlement. But both actors make the most of their duplicitous naughtiness, so that they remain fun to smirk at and enjoy.

The movie rightly belongs to Reiner, Hendricks and Camp, and all three come through quite beautifully, though in the last analysis, the film belong to Ms Reiner. A striking presence (as she was as well in Orange Is the New Black and Equity), here, she is given the chance to open up, reveal more layers of feeling, and actually touch us.

Hendricks, in the slightly smaller role, does the same and with lovely subtlety and ease, while Ms Camp, playing a lady with less on the ball, proves able to hold her own shakier ground quite well. There's a nice sense of theatricality here -- the movie is mostly shot on a single set, so the dialog counts for more than usual -- and there is also a kind of genuine modesty at work.

Egg knows what it's about and what it needs to accomplish, and it manages all this with -- along with some anger -- surprising empathy and grace. From Gravitas Ventures and running just 84 minutes, the film opens theatrically this Friday, January 18, in Los Angeles at the AMC Universal Cinema at Citywalk Hollywood, and in New York City at the Roxy Cinema Tribeca. Simultaneously, Egg will be available nationwide via VOD.

Wednesday, January 16, 2019

The year's best love story: Jon S. Baird's elegiac and beautiful STAN & OLLIE


Don't worry: It's nothing sexual. Yet in STAN & OLLIE -- screenwriter Jeff Pope's and director Jon S. Baird's lovingly recreated tale of the final live-performance tour of that great motion picture comedy team of Stan Laurel and Oliver Hardy -- the filmmakers have managed to come up with the kind of full-fledged, comic, moving love story that we seldom see anymore.

Early on you may notice how very quiet the movie is. It never insists. Instead, it takes you into the world of Laurel & Hardy gently, and you soon begin to realize how actually gentle were so many of the team's most memorable moments. That, as much as anything, accounted for its popularity and fame.

Sure, the pair did slapstick and schtick, but at their core was a kind of sweetness, together with a perseverance, that stood them -- and their audience -- in very good stead.

And that is what director Baird (shown above) and screenwriter Pope (below),
along with their two gifted and versatile leading actors -- John C. Reilly (as Hardy) and Steve Coogan (as Laurel) allow us to discover in this wonderful new film.

Although (very wisely), the filmmakers let us see enough of the pair's comedy routines to understand why they were so popular in their day, the tone here is more elegiac than anything else.

Via the unusual quietude of the script and direction, Pope and Baird capture the beauty of a relationship that was so oddly close that at least one of these two could simply not perform without the other.

And while actors Coogan (above) and Reilly (below) have clearly done their homework as to the look, sound and "feel" of the men they are essaying, this is no mere "impersonation." The actors seem to inhabit not just the bodies of Laurel and Hardy but their very souls. Mr. Coogan, especially, has that soul down pat. This wondrously versatile actor (you must see his performance in The Dinner, if you haven't already, and in any or all of his "Trip" movies) show us here yet another side -- quiet and infinitely subtle -- we've not yet seen, and he is remarkable.

Mr. Reilly, on the other hand, is reliably funny and often just this side of over-the-top, as was Oliver Hardy. The two actors are as good at bringing to fine life these icons of our movie past as they are in bringing to to even better life the inner lives of the two men. You'll come away from Stan & Ollie with as much of a sense of the characters of these men -- their thoughts, hopes, annoyances -- as of their performing lives.

As the two most important women on the scene, both Shirley Henderson (above, left, as Ollie's wife, Lucille) and Nina Arianda (above, right, as Stan's wife, Ida) are entertaining, compelling -- and funny, too.

The film's story takes in the final British tour the comedy duo did in order to impress the man whom Laurel hoped would bankroll their comeback film. The imaginary scenes we see from this would-be film prove both memorably comic (we get to see and hear one of Hardy's most famous retorts) and infinitely sad.

As Stan & Ollie moves quietly along, it builds surprising emotional force via the accumulation of tiny details and small incidents.

Baird's and Pope's refusal to go for the big scenes and most obvious choices results in a little gem of a film -- one of the year's best -- in which repressed feelings somehow land with more meaning and resonance than does the usual Hollywood grandstanding.

From Sony Pictures Classics and running a just-right 97 minutes, after hitting New York and L.A. a few weeks back, Stan & Ollie opens here in South Florida this Friday, January 18, at the AMC Aventura 24, Aventura; Living Room Theaters, Boca Raton; Cinemark Palace 20, Boca Raton; Regal Shadowood 16, Boca Raton; Cinemark 14, Boynton Beach; Cinepolis Coconut Grove, Landmark Merrick Park, Coral Gables; Cinemark Paradise 24, Davie; The Movies of Delray and The Movies of Lake Worth; The Classic Gateway, Fort Lauderdale; Cinepolis 14, Jupiter; CMX Brickell City Center, Miami; Regal South Beach 18, Miami Beach; Cobbs Downtown at the Gardens 16, Palm Beach Gardens. Wherever you live across the USA, simply click here -- and then click on GET TICKETS on the task bar atop the screen to find a theater near you.

Monday, January 14, 2019

From Paraguay, THE HEIRESSES: Marcelo Martinessi's first full-length film is a rich and moving character/situation study


It is unusual enough to view a movie from Paraguay, but when that movie is also a first full-length film from an unknown director that turns out to be not only thoroughly involving but first-class in every respect, this is grounds for rejoicing. So it is with THE HEIRESSES (Las herederas), written and directed by Marcelo Martinessi.

Señor Martinessi (shown at right) has managed to combine themes involving class, change, entitlement, old money vs new, relationships, power, control and prison (of various sorts), all the while providing a study of character and situation that is really quite close to perfection. It has been a long while since I've seen a first film this well done in all areas -- on both sides of the camera.

The tale told is of two women -- Chela and Chiquita -- each from a wealthy (formerly, at least) family who have been lovers/partners for decades but have come upon hard times, due to which they are now forced to sell many of their most precious belongings.

As essayed by Margarita Irun (shown above, who plays Chiquita) and especially Ana Brun (below, left, as Chela), who has the more important role, these women resonate hugely. Ms Brun, in what is apparently her debut role, could hardly be better, as she slowly and quietly wraps us in her at first stand-offish but finally almost warm and completely understandable near embrace.

We get to know the two women, as well as their circle of friends and neighbors, especially once Chiquita has been "removed" to some extent from Chela's immediate life. How and why provides one of the film's many interesting plot devices, leading to some very quietly surprising changes along the way.

We get a look a Paraguay's prison system (women's variety, above), as well as a number of glimpses at the elderly, card-playing old-money wealthy (below) and their gossipy, judgmental habits,

and in particular one younger woman, Angy (very well-played by Ana Ivanova, below,  right), to whom Chela has clearly taken a shine. What happens between these two provides a good deal of the small but irrevocable changes that occur throughout the film, many of which involve those that Chela must make in order to grow and survive.

The manner in which Martinessi has laid out this growth and change is calibrated in such a way -- never too obvious but with enough information provided to keep up interested and on our toes -- that his movie proves consistently compelling and finally moving and even, yes, uplifting. Yet in a very minor key.

What we first perceive as a kind of love is eventually understood to be control. How Chela learns to circumvent some of this makes for one of the great, low-key pleasures of this just-beginning movie-going year.

From Distrib Films US and running 97 minutes, The Heiresses opens in its U.S. theatrical premiere this Wednesday, January 16, in New York City at Film Forum. Elsewhere? Well, it's scheduled to play Los Angeles at Laemmle's Royal in early March, but I can't find any other currently scheduled playdates. But it is difficult to imagine that a foreign film this good won't eventually hit major cities around the USA. Keep watch.

Sunday, January 13, 2019

CALL ME BY YOUR NAME: Lee Liberman's Sunday Corner takes a second look at the Guadagnino/Acimen/Ivory collaboration


The pleasure of this lovely film (streaming on STARZ), in which a peach takes a star turn, lies in the viewer’s willing absorption into a bucolic summer affair that unfolds tentatively, awkwardly, as one remembers first love. The ‘plot’ is the arc of falling in love, aided by one’s own bittersweet recollections of what the hormone avalanche is like — the craving, the hurt, the giddy madness. The film’s title refers to the pair merging with each other, seeing themselves in each other’s eyes — they will call each other by their own names.

Made by a collaboration of notables (at right, James Ivory of the famed Merchant-Ivory team), novelist André Acimen (below, left), and director, Luca Guadagnino (further below, right), the project came together after years of stops and starts, on a low (3.5 million) budget, and was shot in and near picturesque Crema in Northern Italy, the director’s home town, set in the early 80’s when everyone was still smoking and had not disappeared into their cell phones. The source material belongs to novelist Acimen (professor in the graduate school at City
University of New York), who is reportedly writing a sequel. Ivory, the script writer, won an Academy Award last year for best adapted screenplay (the film and lead actor received many nominations and accolades). Director Guadagnino calls this the third film in his trilogy about desire, the prior two being I Am Love and A Bigger Splash (both with Tilda Swinton). This third is particularly universal and beloved because of the mind-meld the director achieves between his material and the audience.
Guadagnino describes this work as a search for the blending of the personality of the actor with the character, and believability of the characters’ finding themselves in each other. Some disagreement developed about the filming of sex and nudity. Ivory’s script was more explicit than Guadagnino’s final cut, but the director was deliberate in taking a minimalist approach, explaining that he’d been there/done that in earlier films. A Bigger Splash was a virtual riot of provocation, nudity, sex. In this story, however, the experiential unfolding of the lovers emotions and their parting grief at summer’s end is intoxicating; explicit sex would call attention to itself rather than the exploration of their feelings. And does he ever succeed — the universality of the emotions possesses one completely as though you are experiencing them yourself.

The story unfolds through the eyes of a beautiful, coltish, 17-year-old, played by the winsome Timothée Chalamet (above, left) whose star just keeps glittering. Elio is bookish, his spare moments devoted to reading, writing, and music. His American father (Michael Stuhlbarg, below, second from left) is a professor of Greco-Roman antiquity, and his lovely mother (Amira Casar) is French. The family chatters back and forth easily in Italian, French, and English with affectionate closeness – an atmosphere both intimate and cosmopolitan — a very inclusive wide wide world.

Elio has a girlfriend from childhood, Marzia, (Esther Garrel, below, sister to French movie idol Louis, daughter of famed film director, Philippe Garrel).

Elio’s father hires a graduate student to join them at their lived-in sprawling villa to assist with his research over the summer. Enter Armie Hammer as blond god Oliver, handsome and self-contained, like the sculptural ancients that Mr. Perlman studies, cool, self-assured. He is both chilly to Elio’s show of desire — and interested — attracted to Elio’s unself-conscious brightness (says Elio: If only you knew how little I know about the things that matter). Elio is plain smitten, not knowing how to behave. The two young men circle around each other nonchalantly, Elio becoming irked at Oliver’s casualness and his own obsession. He has sex for the first time with Marzia, acting out his defiance and frustration.

Oliver tells Elio he doesn’t want to mess things up or cause Elio to have regrets. (We’ve been good, he says, we haven’t done anything to be ashamed of — I want to be good.) Elio, so nurtured and accepted by his parents, boyishly, shamelessly prods and pushes Oliver until he drops his guard, gives in to his own feelings, and they pour themselves into each other.


At summer’s tearful end, Elio’s ‘dream dad’ father offers words of comfort and wisdom, in the conversation much noted and treasured by viewers and reviewers (and reminding me of a 6-year-old who once told me she wished that Mister Rogers were her daddy.) Below the image of Stuhlbarg is André Acimen’s text with the gist of the advice to his grieving son.
 

It appears that dealing with attraction to men has been an issue for Oliver, who would expect his father to humiliate or reject him. Some months after Oliver’s return home, he calls the family to tell them he is engaged to be married. To Elio, though, Oliver says: I remember everything. Elio confesses that his parents know about them. Oliver replies he had felt like a family member, like a son-in-law. “You are so lucky — my father would have carted me off to a correctional facility.” In these exchanges are seeds of a new chapter — what happens to the boy who has always had permission from loving parents to be himself versus the one who scrupulously avoids rejection by conforming to expectations.

James Ivory has expressed disinterest in participating in a sequel, while Acimen and Guadagnino look forward to what comes next for Oliver and Elio. Their views suggest different ways to think about the story — one is to imagine the issues that may surface in the lives of two people who have been raised with different expectations. Would Elio find love with a woman or choose a man, having felt entirely free in his choice? Will Oliver be happy in his marriage of expectation, have other partners, or take control of his heart and leave? The other view, and where James Ivory’s beautiful script leaves us, is, at least for now, to contemplate the breathless perfection of a magical love that timed-out naturally because it happened between two people traveling different paths. And that provides our bittersweet ending: Elio smiling through a wash of tears into a crackling winter fire.


The above post was written by our 
monthly correspondent, Lee Liberman.

Friday, January 11, 2019

HIPPOCRATES: DIARY OF A FRENCH DOCTOR -- proves yet another interesting French medicine movie from Thomas Lilti


Thomas Lilti seems a filmmaker smitten with the medicine bug. Of the four full-length films and single television series he has directed (and either written or co-written), only one of these -- his first film, Les yeux bandés -- did not deal primarily with doctors, hospitals and patients. TrustMovies does not know French cinema all that well, but he suspects it might be safe to call out M. Lilti as the go-to guy for movies medicinal. The current home video release of his 2014 film, HIPPOCRATES: DIARY OF A FRENCH DOCTOR (which saw a very limited U.S. arthouse theatrical run in the summer of 2015) simply adds to the ammunition for this idea, which began when I viewed via last year's home video release of another of his movies, The Country Doctor.

Turns out that M. Lilti, pictured at right, was actually a medical doctor prior to his movie career so this, I suspect, adds a good deal of veracity to his work. The Country Doctor (from 2016) dealt with a younger female physician taking over the practice of an older doctor (who is silently suffering from a cancer diagnosis). Hippocrates, was actually made two years prior and details the experiences of two interns in a city hospital which seems to have gone from public to privately-owned -- which means having to somehow turn a profit.

One of these interns is a very young man, played by the baby-faced Vincent Lacoste (above), and the other is an older immigrant (the always excellent Reda Kateb, below) who was a full-fledged doctor in his native Algeria but now must work his way back up the ladder in France.

How these two interact with each other, with their patients and the rest of the hospital staff -- Lacoste's characters is the son of one of the primary doctors at the hospital, and so this complicates matters -- provides the meat of the movie, during which we see the physicians in charge make decisions more for the good of the hospital than for the good of their patients.

The supporting cast includes Marianne Denicourt (above, right, playing a physician torn between doing the right thing and the most politic thing) and Jacques Gamblin (above, center, as Lacoste's dad, who is also between that rock and hard place). No one here is an out-and-out villain, but our two interns are definitely the "heroes" of the movie.

The questions the film raises are very much worth asking and ruminating over, and the details of hospital life and death seem compelling and true. Overall, the film's worth seeing but, as with The Country Doctor, the finale seems just a little too rushed, easy and "feel-good" to be totally acceptable. It turns reality a tad too much toward the typical movie happy ending.

Running a relatively lean 102 minutes and released theatrically by Distrib Films US and now on DVD via Icarus Home Video, Hippocrates: Diary of a French Doctor hits the street this coming Tuesday, January 15 -- for purchase and/or (I hope) rental.