Backing up Mr. Šulík (shown at right) are a good story; interesting characters, well-drawn and acted by the ensemble; and -- primarily -- a fascinating look at what a gypsy community is like today, as the world grows ever smaller so that the moving from place to place that used to distinguish gypsy life (if one can believe all that we've seen and read about gypsies over the decades) is no longer practical or maybe even possible. I would have thought that all this would be enough for one movie but perhaps Šulík's idea from the beginning was to do Hamlet in modern-day and -dress, setting it in the gypsy community.
Beginning with a shot of a pair of riveting eyes that totally fill the screen, the filmmaker knows how to reel us in with a stylistic touch that immediately turns toward character definition. Shot in grungy blues, greys and browns so that a bright color, when it occasionally appears, pleasures us enormously, his movie never buries us in the dirt and muck as much as it forces us to understand the kind of moral universe in which its people abide -- a world that is equally mucky and dirty and more than a little unfair. All of us do what we must in order to live, but some of us must do a lot more, in a lot messier ways, to survive.
The screenplay sometimes comes up with a wonderful bit of dialog ("She was so beautiful, she didn't have to wash"), and its introduction of a group of "musical anthropologists" opens the movie up just a bit to a life for our protagonist that might exist outside the boundaries of his community. (Though the gypsies' sense of what's out there in the "other" world does seems charmingly off-base: "We'll go to London where they'll think we're Pakistanis, and they'll like us!" Ah, yes, Britain is know throughout the world for how welcoming it has been to its Paki population!)
Forced thievery, arranged marriage, and a local priest (above, center left), who, though accused of being gay, is less a predator than a very genuine help to our hero -- all this conspires to make the movie real and meaningful. So what about this "ghost" who keep materializing? Well, you could imagine that this is the hero's own thoughts and remembrances taking form. But, then, what about the introduction of that knife-on-ice? The whole finale, in fact, seems a tad too easily achieved -- including those ostriches, which, like Chekhov's gun, if they appear once, you just know you're gonna see 'em waddle again.
Despite the melodrama, for those with a particular interest in gypsy culture, Gypsy will be unmissable. The friend with whom I attended the press screening, in fact, sent me a link to some interesting online gypsy information for further reading. Click here (to learn of an earlier and highly regarded and award-winning gypsy movie from the 1960s) and here (to access a well-received book of readings on the gypsy world). And of course, there is always the interesting, gypsy-filled oeuvre of filmmaker Tony Gatlif. Meanwhile, this Gypsy (107 minutes, in Slovak and Romany, with English subtitles) opens Wednesday, June 27, in New York City at Film Forum. Other playdates? Haven't a clue, nor do I know the film's distributor, in order to be able to check a website there.
No comments:
Post a Comment